CNN: “Edwards eyes $105M from public kitty”

I’m all for writing critical articles about candidates rather than just rewriting their press releases and posting them, but did CNN really need to use “Edwards eyes $105M from public kitty” as the front-page title link to the story about Edwards’s decision to accept public financing? Really? The story itself is actually fine, but the title as it appears on the front page just makes Edwards sound bad, and it isn’t clear what it means.

I reported the story as it may affect the Iowa Caucuses over at Iowa Independent.